Legal Opinion
Danforth v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2006No. A04-1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Syllabus by the Court
1. As stated in State v. Houston, 702 N.W.2d 268 , 270
(Minn. 2005), this court applies the framework of Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), when determining the extent of retroactive application of a decision of the United States Supreme Court announcing a rule of federal constitutional criminal procedure.
2.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ElmoreOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- People v. BaretNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.