Legal Opinion

Blum v. Sams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1923No. 939. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

Sams and wife sued Blum and wife for debt to recover the sum of $500 and to establish an equitable vendor’s lien oh the south half of lot 8 in block 20 of the Cave addition to the city of Houston, and to foreclose said lien. They alleged that on May 14, 1919, they owned and occupied said property' as their home; that defendant A. J. Blum, N. T. Lewis, - Campbell, and James L. Bailey were doing business under the name and style of Feature Film & Supply Company under a trust agreement, and'that same constituted a partnership; that plaintiff J'. E. Sams undertook to negotiate with said Feature…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. KaslingTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. W. F. Stewart & Co. v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Shipman v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. McConnell v. Payne & WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. Texas General Ins. AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. West Texas Utilities Company v. PirtleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Kelsey v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API