Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kelsey v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1930No. 691Published

1ConcurrenceFunderburk, J.

The writer concurs in the disposition of the appeal solely upon the authority of McDonald v. Cabiness, 100 Tex. 615, 102 S. W. 721, and the other cases cited in the opinion by Judge LESLIE. It appears to me that McDonald v. CaMness and most of the other cases are not distinguishable from this upon any sound principle. Unless, however, the pleadings in each of said eases are properly to be regarded as alleging a contract to which only the plaintiff and the defendant, against whom recovery was sustained, were parties, then I am equally unable to perceive any distinction in principle between…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morris v. KaslingTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McDonald v. CabinessTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Gammage v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API