Knight-Morley Corp. v. Ajax Mfg. Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
Action by plaintiffs for claimed infringement of a mounting adaptable for holding a rear view mirror on the outside of an automobile. This is an “improvement patent” and plaintiffs not only claim infringement, but allege defendants guilty of unfair competition.
Defendants admit infringement of claim two of the alleged patent but deny they have infringed claim one; deny they have been guilty of unfair competition and principally insist that the structure is not patentable.
The questioned article is designed to fit on automobiles having a decorative molding strip along the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frederick v. Fowler v. Sponge Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Hazeltine Research v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949