McNutt v. Pabst
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. Franklin J. Cole, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
In the year 1909 Cyrus F. McNutt, Joseph E. Hannon, and Benjamin Balmer, as attorneys at law, were employed by respondents to defend in two actions then pending in the superior court in the county of Los Angeles, in each of which respondents appeared as parties defendant. Cyrus P. McNutt has since died, and his executrix has been substituted herein in his stead. The actions first referred to concerned the question as to the title to a certain lot of land, comprising about eight acres. Pursuant to their employment the attorneys for respondents prepared their defense to the first action, which…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BuschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Redo Y Cia v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Shahabian v. NajarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Stoll, Exr. v. Rich, Exr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Logan v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917