Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 24, 2008No. 26464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Counsel for petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, pursuant to Johnson v. State, 294 S.C. 310, 364 S.E.2d 201 (1988), from the denial, after a hearing, of petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief (PCR). Petitioner has filed a pro se response.

We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari on the issue of the PCR judge’s refusal to relieve PCR counsel, 1 dispense with the requirements of a merits petition and brief, and affirm the denial of petitioner’s PCR application. However, we take this opportunity to address the recurring problem of PCR applicants seeking…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. GraddickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Goss, Sr. v. KendellDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API