Richardson v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Counsel for petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, pursuant to Johnson v. State, 294 S.C. 310, 364 S.E.2d 201 (1988), from the denial, after a hearing, of petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief (PCR). Petitioner has filed a pro se response.
We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari on the issue of the PCR judge’s refusal to relieve PCR counsel, 1 dispense with the requirements of a merits petition and brief, and affirm the denial of petitioner’s PCR application. However, we take this opportunity to address the recurring problem of PCR applicants seeking…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. GraddickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hilton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Goss, Sr. v. KendellDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024