Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 14, 1992No. 23759PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the dismissal of Samuel E. Whitehead’s (Whitehead) application for postconviction relief (PCR). Whitehead contends that the PCR judge erred by failing to appoint counsel or obtain a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel. We reverse and remand for a new PCR hearing.

I. PACTS

Whitehead pleaded guilty to first-degree burglary and committing a lewd act on a minor. His first PCR application was dismissed as meritless. We denied his petition for writ of certiorari to review that ruling.

Whitehead filed a second PCR application and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Wade v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Gary v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API