Whitehead v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
We granted certiorari to review the dismissal of Samuel E. Whitehead’s (Whitehead) application for postconviction relief (PCR). Whitehead contends that the PCR judge erred by failing to appoint counsel or obtain a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel. We reverse and remand for a new PCR hearing.
I. PACTS
Whitehead pleaded guilty to first-degree burglary and committing a lewd act on a minor. His first PCR application was dismissed as meritless. We denied his petition for writ of certiorari to review that ruling.
Whitehead filed a second PCR application and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Odom v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Wade v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Gary v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.