Legal Opinion
Brandywine Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 1993No. 92-AA-885, 92-AA-886 and 92-AA-1302PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
These are consolidated petitions by housing providers seeking review of the decisions of the D.C. Rental Housing Commission, reversing the hearing examiners’ decisions to grant capital improvement petitions under D.C.Code § 45-2520 (Repl.1990). The capital improvement petitions for three apartment buildings sought approval of a number of additions, including microwave ovens, vanities, dishwashers and extra bathroom mirrors, that the providers claimed fell within the scope of § 45-2520. The Commission dismissed the petitions with respect to these four additions based on its conclusion that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Charles W. Travelstead, Claimant-Appellee v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary, of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tenants of 1255 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fort Chaplin Park Associates v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994