Legal Opinion

Hawkeye Bank & Trust Co. v. Michel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 21, 1985No. 84-1636PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This is a real estate mortgage foreclosure proceeding brought after the borrowers defaulted on their payments of a series of notes. The principal question is whether a dragnet clause in a deed of trust effectively pledged defendants’ homestead as security for future notes. The trial court held it did and we agree.

We quote and adopt as our own the statement of facts contained in appellants’ appellate brief.

Rose Marie Michel, in connection with her business as a dealer for “Wick Homes,” and her husband, Donald Mathew Michel, entered into a series of promissory notes with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freese Leasing, Inc. v. Union Trust & Savings Bank, StanwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Emporia State Bank & Trust Co. v. MounkesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. State v. BuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Department of General Services, State of Iowa v. R.M. Boggs Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Union Story Trust & Savings Bank v. SayerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkeye Bank & Trust, National Ass'n v. BaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Decorah State Bank v. ZidlickySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Chames v. DeMayoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Beal Bank v. SiemsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. Decorah State Bank v. ZidlickySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API