Legal Opinion

Department of General Services, State of Iowa v. R.M. Boggs Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 20, 1983No. 69351PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal which could have been avoided. The Boggs Corporation was granted an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of its motion for continuance made after it became apparent to the attorney for The Boggs Corporation that he was scheduled, in the same courthouse, for two overlapping trials. We hold that the trial court’s denial of the motion was an abuse of discretion and reverse.

This case is an example of the morass of difficulties involved in bringing a multi-party case to trial. On April 14, 1978, an anchor and expansion joint on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Des Moines v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. State v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Rush v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Gray v. GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Madison Silos, Division of Martin Marietta Corp. v. WassomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Junkins v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Norton v. Administrative Director of the CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Glenn v. Farmland Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. SHANNON BY SHANNON v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Krugman v. Palmer College of ChiropracticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API