Legal Opinion

Decorah State Bank v. Zidlicky

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 20, 1988No. 87-1036Published

1Opinion of the Court

426 N.W.2d 388 (1988)

DECORAH STATE BANK, Appellant,

v.

Arthur M. ZIDLICKY and Gatriel M. Zidlicky, Appellees.

No. 87-1036.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

July 20, 1988.

Richard D. Zahasky, Decorah, for appellant.

Robert H. Story, Cresco, for appellees.

Considered by McGIVERIN, C.J., and HARRIS, LARSON, LAVORATO, and ANDREASEN, JJ.

HARRIS, Justice.

In this mortgage foreclosure action the plaintiff bank contends that a future advances clause served to obligate both defendants on a subsequent promissory note. The trial court held the clause was not enforceable against the defendant wife. We agree.

Defendants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Freese Leasing, Inc. v. Union Trust & Savings Bank, StanwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Emporia State Bank & Trust Co. v. MounkesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Lyon v. WillieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Decorah State Bank v. ZidlickySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API