Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Newcomb

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 12, 2011No. 2010-059Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLynn, J.

I agree with the majority that Captain O’Sullivan had probable cause to arrest the defendant. I also agree that, if the inventory search of the U-Haul truck was invalid, it makes sense in the circumstances of this case to remand to the trial court to determine whether there was probable cause for the search warrant in the absence of the information gleaned from the inventory search and to address the standing and “fruits” issues identified by the majority. I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the inventory search violated the police department policy concerning such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Rollins-ErcolinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. WinwardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  3. Appeal of GeekieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Appeal of Town of PittsfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API