Legal Opinion
Appeal of Geekie
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 22, 2008No. 2007-411PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The petitioners, James Geekie, William Roach, III, William Roach, IV, James Roach, Robin Hughes, Richard Cornish, Brian Manougian and Mark Warrington, appeal a decision of the New Hampshire Department of Labor (DOL) dismissing their claims under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (the Act), RSA chapter 275-E (1999 & Supp. 2007). The respondent, Pease Development Authority, Division of Ports and Harbors (division), cross-appeals. We affirm.
The following facts, which were either found by the DOL hearing officer or are supported by the record and consistent with DOL’s findings and rulings, are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- In Re Diana P.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Hunter v. R. G. Watkins & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- In re Craig T.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ruel v. New Hampshire Real Estate Appraiser BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Appeal of Lake Sunapee Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Com. v. Williams, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- State v. NewcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. NewcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011