Legal Opinion

Murray v. Kauffman Buick Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1938No. 27201. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The plaintiff, Denise Larson Murray, sued Kauffman Buick Company, a corporation, and Norman Hartbauer, for the purpose of recovering damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff as the result of a collision between an automobile being driven by plaintiff and one owned by defendant corporation and driven by defendant Hartbauer. The latter was not served with process and did not appear in the action, although he testified on the trial as a witness for defendant. The action was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in a substantial sum. The trial court granted a motion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. International Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Ludberg v. BarghoornWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. BrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Van Vranken v. Fence-CraftIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sweazey v. Valley Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. United States v. Harold KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Carmin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API