Diversey Corporation v. Mertz
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit for infringement of two patents, Adler, No. 1,734,706, and Kochs, No. 1,962,821, issued to plaintiff as assignee of the respective applicants. Defendant asserts invalidity and denies infringement. He files a counterclaim in which he avers that the Adler invention is his and should be assigned to him. In view of the defense that Adler was not the inventor and the issue presented by the counterclaim, I shall consider, first of all, the question of invention by Adler.
Defendant was formerly plaintiff’s vice president and general sales manager…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- American Circular Loom Co. v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Davis v. HamlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koehring Company v. ED Etnyre & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Standard Brands Inc. v. U. S. Partition & Packaging Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- LeFiell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- In re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939