Legal Opinion

In re Christmann

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1939No. 4198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the examiner denying patentability in view of prior art cited of all the claims, numbered 1 to 8, inclusive, in an application for patent bearing the title “For Reaction Products of Organic Bases and Hydrofluosilicic Acid.”

Claim 1, which is generic in the class of claims before us, reads as follows:

1. An insecticidal composition including a reaction product of hydrofluo-silicic acid and a guanidine.

In each of the other claims a specific kind of guanidine is named. It seems to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diversey Corporation v. MertzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re ZurkoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In Re Mary E. Zurko, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. LipnerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Varian v. LlewellynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Varian v. LlewellynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API