Legal Opinion

Brod v. Cincinnati Time Recorder Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1947No. 6847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, PJ.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on the pleadings and the facts developed in’ a colloquy between the court and counsel at the opening of the trial.

In the amended- petition, the plaintiff alleged that he purchased certain choses in action from the defendant and 'that the defendant executed and delivered to him a written assignment therefore in the following language:

“FOR VALUE RECEIVED, The Cincinnati 'Time Recorder' Company, an Ohio corporation, the Assignor, does, without recourse on it, hereby sell, assign, transfer and set over unto Joseph T. Brod, doing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Hamman Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dickson v. Merchants' Elevator Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wiltberger v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Davis v. FlexmanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
  4. Estate of Byers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Estate of Byers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API