Cecil & Geiser, L.L.P. v. Plymale
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff, Cecil & Geiser, L.L.P., appeals the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. Defendants, Ronald E. Plymale and the law firm Plymale & Dingus, L.L.C., also appeal the decision of the trial court. For the following reasons, we remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
{¶ 2} Cecil & Geiser, L.L.P., formerly Plymale Partnership, L.L.P. (“Cecil & Geiser”), assign the following errors:
I. The Trial Court bifurcated Count Four of the Amended Complaint for hearing but then erred when it dismissed the remaining counts after the December…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hill v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Smith v. Wyandot Mem'l Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- AIM 360, L.L.C. v. HemlebenOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re Estate of McCauleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014