Legal Opinion

Hill v. Marshall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2013No. 12AP-805PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Hill v. Marshall,

2013-Ohio-5538.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Mark A. Hill, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 12AP-805 v. : (C.P.C. No. 11CVE-5543) Le Andre Marshall, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellee. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on December 17, 2013 Mark A. Hill, pro se. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas KLATT, P.J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Mark A. Hill, appeals a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas that dismissed his case with prejudice for failure to prosecute. For the following reasons, we reverse that judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sizemore v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Logsdon v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sazima v. ChalkoOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Davis v. Immediate Medical Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whipple v. Estate of PrentissOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Geico Cas. Ins. Co. v. Durant-BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Simmons v. NarineOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. St. Vincent Charity v. PaluscsakOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Garofolo v. West Bay Care & Rehab. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API