Legal Opinion
Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 13, 1993No. 14609PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
In this appeal concerning the applicability of the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) *405§ 31-284 (a),1 we granted certification to consider whether the Appellate Court had improperly concluded that the plaintiff had not suffered a job related injury when he was discharged in a manner that allegedly caused him emotional distress.2 We dismiss the appeal on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The opinion of the Appellate Court; Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation, 27 Conn. App. 800, 609 A.2d 1034 (1992);…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNamara v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Town of Farmington v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Esposito v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Karch v. BayBank FSBSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Fennell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Anderson v. SchiefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.