Legal Opinion

United States v. Gilkeson

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided May 9, 2006No. 5:05-cr-00399PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER

HURD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant James Gilkeson (“defendant” or “Gilkeson”) was arrested by the Syracuse Police for endangering the welfare of a child in violation of New York Penal Law § 260.10. During the course of interrogation he signed a consent form permitting the search of his computer. The results of the search resulted in a federal indictment listing charges related to child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) and 2256(8)(A).

Defendant moves to suppress the physical evidence seized under the auspices of the consent to search. Defendant…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Pinto-ThomazDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. COLEMAN-FULLER v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. City of Birmingham v. MajorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. State v. RippeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. Sendra BeauregardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API