Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Gause

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1933No. 1386-5988PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

On April 29, 1918, John P. Gause and 'Mamie Cato, in contemplation of their marriage, entered into a purported prenuptial agreement. Portions of the agreement pertinent to this controversy are as follows:

“They, Jno. P. Gause and Mamie Cato, if said marriage so intended shall be had and solemnized, do waive and declare void all the community laws of the State of Texas, so far as the property they now own or may hereafter become possessed of is concerned. They also contract and agree with each other that each may sell and dispose of the property now owned by them, or may hereafter acquire, as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. v. TaborTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Kellett v. TriceTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brokaw v. CollettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Dunn v. VinyardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Eggemeyer v. EggemeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Williams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Turcotte v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Beck v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API