Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Young v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1912No. Civil No. 1268PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Original application by the State of Arizona, on the relation of Anna F. Young and others, for mandamus against the Superior Court of the County of Pima, William F. Cooper presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

Anna F. Young, George L. Young, and Mannierre E. Young, by their attorney Louis G. Hummel, served notice on the superior court of Pima county, Arizona, and W. F. Cooper, judge thereof, that on June 27, 1912, *128application would be made to this court for an alternative writ of mandamus, and a copy of the petition for the writ, served with the notice, is as follows:

“Louis G. Hummel, being first duly sworn, says: That he is the attorney for Anna F. Young, George L. Young, and Mannierre E. Young, next of kin of George B. MeAneny, deceased, and persons interested in said decedent’s estate. That the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McPherson v. HattichArizona Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Connor Livestock Co. v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Garver v. ThomanArizona Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API