Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Bayside Land Co.
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. Z. B. West, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this ease the motion to dismiss- the appeal from final judgment on the ground that the appeal was not taken within the time provided by law was granted from the bench. As the matter involved the construction of certain sections of our Code of Civil Procedure relative to appeals, it is deemed proper to briefly state the reasons on which the decision of the court is based.
The final judgment herein was actually entered in the superior court on August 10, 1917, and the appeal was not taken until November 9, 1917, which was more than sixty days after the entry of the judgment. Our law…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Peters v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Radford v. Crown City Lumber & Mill Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.