Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Daum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1950No. Appeal, No. 44PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether the findings of fact by the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board are supported by substantial and legally credible evidence. The court below ruled that they were not thus supported and sustained the appeal of the employer. This appeal followed.

This Court in Lester v. The Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 364 Pa. 541, 73 A. 2d 681, stated the well established rule that findings of fact by a Labor Relations Board are conclusive if supported by substantial and legally credible evidence. We have repeatedly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lester v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. CadmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Sansom House Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Crivelli Bros. Coal & Builders Supplies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API