Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. O'Brien

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooke

The plaintiff in error, William J. O’Brien, was found guilty in the municipal court of Chicago of conducting a private detective agency in the city of Chicago without a license, in violation of an ordinance of the city, and was fined $25 and costs. The validity of said ordinance being involved and the trial judge having certified that in his opinion the public interest required that the cause be taken directly to this court, O’Brien has sued out a writ of error from this court seeking to reverse the judgment of the municipal court.

The ordinance for the violation of which plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Friend v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Chicago v. M. & M. Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. McPherson v. Village of ChebanseIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. City of Chicago v. DrogasawaczIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kiel v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Clark Teachers' Agency v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  3. Linehan v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  4. City of Chicago v. DollarhideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. City of Marion v. CrioloIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API