Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Dollarhide

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 2, 1930No. Gen. No. 33,533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

On a trial before the court without a jury defendant was found- guilty of carrying on a general brokerage business without a city license and fined the sum of $25, upon which finding a judgment was entered after the court had overruled defendant’s motion in arrest of the judgment, and defendant brings the cause here by appeal.

In the inception of the trial, Mr. Leon Hornstein, representing the city, made the following statement:

“It is stipulated and agreed that the defendant is a resident of, and is and during 1928 and prior thereto was engaged in business in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Crenshaw v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Stockard v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. People ex rel. Friend v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bittner v. American-Marietta CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
  2. Jones v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. State v. McKenneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. State v. McKenneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API