Laminations, Inc. v. Roma Direct Marketing LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge.
At issue in this litigation is a patent licensed to Plaintiff Laminations, Inc. (“Laminations”), for a plant cultivation apparatus, also known as a self-watering planter. Laminations alleges that Defendants Roma Direct Marketing LLC (“Roma Direct”), John T. Hawkins, and Kenneth McDowell (collectively, “Defendants”), designed, marketed, and sold a competing product — The Garden Patch— that infringes upon its patent.
Presently before the Court is Lamina-tions’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt. Entry 8.) Because it has failed to demonstrate…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quad/Tech, Inc. v. Q.I. Press Controls B.V.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- McDAVID KNEE GUARD, INC. v. NIKE USA, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010