Legal Opinion

Laminations, Inc. v. Roma Direct Marketing LLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 2007No. 3:CV-06-2108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge.

At issue in this litigation is a patent licensed to Plaintiff Laminations, Inc. (“Laminations”), for a plant cultivation apparatus, also known as a self-watering planter. Laminations alleges that Defendants Roma Direct Marketing LLC (“Roma Direct”), John T. Hawkins, and Kenneth McDowell (collectively, “Defendants”), designed, marketed, and sold a competing product — The Garden Patch— that infringes upon its patent.

Presently before the Court is Lamina-tions’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt. Entry 8.) Because it has failed to demonstrate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quad/Tech, Inc. v. Q.I. Press Controls B.V.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. McDAVID KNEE GUARD, INC. v. NIKE USA, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API