Legal Opinion
McDAVID KNEE GUARD, INC. v. NIKE USA, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 14, 2010No. 08 CV 6584PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs McDavid Knee Guard and Stirling Moulding Limited (collectively “McDavid”) filed this lawsuit against defendant Nike USA, Inc. (“Nike”), alleging that Nike has been and currently is importing foam padded shorts manufactured in Taiwan by a process that infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,743,325 (“'325 patent”), which was issued on June 1, 2004, for a method of manufacturing “flexible material ... suitable for providing protective war [sic] for human and animal bodies.” ('325 patent,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Campbell Soup Company v. Conagra, Inc. Sallie W. Rosenthal Conagra, Inc. And Sallie RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Nutrition 21 v. The United States of America v. Thorne Research, Inc., Albert F. CzapCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- ENOCH v. PERRYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Varex Imaging Corporation v. Richardson Electronics, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019