Legal Opinion

Quad/Tech, Inc. v. Q.I. Press Controls B.V.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

At issue in this litigation is a patent licensed to Plaintiff Quad/Tech, Inc. (“Quad/Tech”), for a printing registration control system used with newspaper and commercial printing presses. Quad/Tech alleges that Defendants Q.I. Press Controls, B.V. (“Q.I., B.V.”), Q.I. Press Controls North America, LTD., Inc. (“Q.I.N.A.”) or (collectively, “Q.I. Defendants”), and Print2Finish, LLC (“Print2Finish”) (collectively, “Defendants”), designed, marketed, and sold a competing product — the mRC System that infringes upon its patent.

Presently…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  2. Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. AUTOBAR SYSTEMS OF N.J. v. BERG COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. DROSOS & ASSOCIATES, PC v. TD BANK NADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API