Legal Opinion

Corbett v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 12, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

While the record is voluminous and has entailed much study and investigation, the case really falls within a very narrow compass.

The questions presented are these:

1. Were the commodities, “wood splint or veneer boxes, fruit or berry inside carriers, s. u. nested,” “vegetable hampers nested and wood splint or veneer boxes, fruit or berry inside carriers, s. u. nested,” and “vegetable hampers nested,” manufactured by plaintiff and duly tendered the defendant for intrastate shipments, subject to lumber rates under note A, Item 66 of E. H. Dulaney, I. C. C. No. 21, exceptions to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Thompson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Nance v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Williamson v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Wimberly v. Washington Furniture Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Brewington v. . LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API