Legal Opinion
In re the Republic of Ecuador
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 9, 2012No. Nos. 11-mc-80171 CRB (NC), 10-mc-80324 CRB (NC), 10-mc-80087 CRB (NC), 11-mc-80110 CRB (NC), 11-mc-80225 CRB (NC), 11-mc-80172 CRB (NC)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLICANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DR. MICHAEL A. KELSH
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Republic of Ecuador moves to compel the further production of documents from Respondent Kelsh and his former employer, Exponent, Inc., under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. Kelsh, Exponent, and intervenor Chevron Corporation oppose the motion under the authority of amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
The issues presented here include whether Rule 26, as amended December 1, 2010, applies to these…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Republic of Ecuador v. Douglas MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Raimey v. Wright National Flood InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Little v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Republic of Ecuador v. DouglasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.