Legal Opinion

Little v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 22, 2013No. 88PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

Professional malpractice cases are unique in that the defendants are often highly trained and experienced professionals who possess credentials and specialized knowledge similar to that of an expert witness. In a medical malpractice case, like this one, there is a legal distinction between a defendant physician who testifies based solely on what she did and what she observed in her actual treatment of the patient (a fact witness), and a physician who gives opinions based upon facts and/or materials furnished to him during the course of litigation (an expert witness). See, e.g., In re…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Farley v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Terry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Margolis v. Sandy Spring BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Richardson v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  5. Cagle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API