Legal Opinion
City of Lawton v. Akers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 1958No. 37721Published
1Opinion of the Court
333 P.2d 520 (1958)
The CITY OF LAWTON, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Paul AKERS et al., Defendants in Error.
No. 37721.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 16, 1958.
Warren Chrisman, City Atty., Lawton, Smith, Crowe & Leaming, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Walter Hubbell, Walters, Barney & Pain, Anadarko, for defendants in error.
A.L. Jeffrey, Municipal Counselor, Edward H. Moler, Ass't Municipal Counselor, Oklahoma City, George W. Miller, City Atty., Ponca City, Walter J. Arnote, City Atty., McAlester, T. Fred Collins, City Atty., Ardmore, T.O. Criswell, City Atty.,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Gilfillan v. City of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bragdon v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.