Legal Opinion

Tefft v. Stern

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1896No. 348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the UMted States for the Southern Division of the Western District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

BARR, District Judge.

This was a proceeding by the plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error, under a writ of garnishment, under a Michigan statute, to make the garnishee liable to the plaintiffs’ judgment for the sum of $3,728.19, upon the theory that a chattel mortgage, executed on the 18th of September, 1893, by Charles Livingston and Henry Block, partners, under the firm name of Livingston & Block, to the defendant in error, Henry Stern, was fraudulent and void. The issue w’as tried before Judge Lurton and a jury, and a verdict found, under his instructions, for the defendant in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Canter v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Elastic Fabrics Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Heineman v. SchlossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. C. J. Huebel Co. v. LeaperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. In re North Babylon Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v. Western Heater DispatchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  5. Smathers v. . Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API