Legal Opinion
C. J. Huebel Co. v. Leaper
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1911No. 2,119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Knappen, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan. Action by Henry E. Leaper against C. J. Huebel Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The defendant in error, Henry E. Leaper, whom we shall, for convenience, call the plaintiff, sued the C. J. Huebel Company (a corporation), which we shall call the defendant, for damages ’ resulting from the alleged breach of a contract which was in writing, and the material parts of which are as follows :
“This agreement', made and entered into this twelfth day of January, 1907, by and between H. E. Reaper of Green Bay, county of Brown, state of Wisconsin, party of the first part, and G. J. Huebel Co., of Menominee, Michigan, party of the second part, witnesseth:
“That…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Teal v. BilbySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Farrar v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
- American Nat. Bank of Arkansas City v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Tefft v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Tefft v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chesbrough v. WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Champion Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Irwin Glass Co. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Rash v. Shower Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- New York, C. & St. L. R. v. NiebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.