Legal Opinion

Early v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1909No. 4141PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, his punishment being assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

The evidence is conflicting and it is not intended here to discuss its sufficiency. The accomplice testified to a state of case which, if sufficiently corroborated, might sustain the conviction. The indictment charges appellant with taking one ten dollar bill and one five dollar bill, current money of the United States of America, of the value of fifteen ($15) dollars. The evidence shows only that he took “a ten dollar bill and a five dollar bill.” No witness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. State v. Fulks and FeurtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API