Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1907No. 3906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft under $50, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and twenty days confinement in the county jail.

Appellant objected to the following charge of the court on the question of accomplice: “You are instructed that the witness, D. L. Kain, who testified for the State, is an accomplice. In this connection you are charged that a conviction in this case cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice alone, unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense committed, and the corroboration is not sufficient if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Little Rock & Hot Springs Western Railroad v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Early v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Belcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Boxley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. State v. McComasMontana Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API