Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Boyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1929No. Docket No. 6649PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a decree in favor of plaintiff as administrator quieting the title of Hannah Boyle, deceased, to a piece of property in the city and county of San Francisco. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll alone.

The complaint alleged that the deceased at the time of her death, January 18, 1920, was the owner in fee simple of the property described. It also alleged that on the ninth day of November, 1911, said decedent in her lifetime obtained a decree quieting title against all persons under the provisions of what is commonly known as the McEnerney Act. (Stats. 1906 (Ex. Sess.),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Martin v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Holmes v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API