Legal Opinion

Holmes v. O'Brien

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1915No. Civ. No. 1619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. J. 0. Moncur, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This was an action to quiet title to a piece of real property in the city and county of San Francisco, in the course of which the plaintiff sought to have set aside a decree obtained by Patrick O’Brien, one of the defendants, quieting his title to the same premises.

There is no very material dispute about the facts of the case, which the record shows to be substantially these: The plaintiff is one of the daughters of said defendant Patrick O ’Brien and the other defendant and the appellant herein is his other daughter. During the last illness of Patrick O’Brien’s wife and the mother of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Boyle v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API