Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Simon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1925No. 11,196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen

This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution. There was a directed verdict for defendant, and, upon the overruling of a motion for new trial, judgment was entered accordingly. The plaintiff has sued out this writ, and applies for a supersedeas.

The action was originally instituted by Sam Bernstein, plaintiff in error here, against Herman Simon, the defendant above mentioned, and one Ferdinand Klein. The cause is here after a second trial. The case was dismissed as to Klein at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence at the first trial. The plaintiff then obtained a verdict against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Krug v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Albright v. McTigheU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1892
  3. Grimes v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. RegierNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Duffy v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Technical Computer Services, Inc. v. BuckleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Rhodes v. Copic Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Sussex Real Estate Corp. v. SbroccaColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API