Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TANGLE INC., Case No. 23-cv-01196-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 9 v. RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10 ARITZIA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendants. 11 12 13 Now before the Court is Defendants Aritzia, Inc., Aritzia LP, and Unites States of Aritzia, 14 Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Renewed Motion to Dismiss. The Court has considered the 15 parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, the record in this case, and oral argument. For the 16 following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.