Legal Opinion

Wright v. Hasley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1979No. 76-207PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Callow, J.

This is an appeal from an order which in part denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s claim seeking dam ages for alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm. The defendant also appeals from an order denying her motion to compel the plaintiff to answer certain questions objected to in the course of a deposition. Because this part of the order is not appeal-able, the appeal from it is dismissed.

The plaintiff premised her action, to recover damages for the defendant’s alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress, on various activities…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Midwest Knitting Mills, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API