Legal Opinion
Kandra v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 30, 2001No. CIV. 01-6124-AAPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move for a preliminary injunction against defendant United States of America, Department of Interior, enjoining the Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation”) from implementing the Klamath Reclamation Project 2001 Annual Operations Plan (“2001 Plan” or “Plan”). Under the 2001 Plan, water elevations of Upper Klamath Lake and water flows below Iron Gate Dam will be maintained to support endangered sucker fish and threatened coho salmon. Due to inadequate water supplies, no irrigation water deliveries will be made to the majority of land within the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ecology Center, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.