Legal Opinion

Ex parte Day

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1934No. 16916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Complaint was filed in a justice court of Travis County charging that appellant exhibited a machine and instrument, viz: a coin operated handkerchief vending machine intended and designed for use by the general public and for the purpose of vending handkerchiefs, and being a machine for which an occupation tax is required to be paid,— said machine being commonly known as a five cent machine, requiring and being operated by depositing therein a five cent coin as a fee for each operation and for each handkerchief sold by said machine; said appellant not having annexed or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Beard v. RowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  4. Davey v. County of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Ex Parte WalkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dancetown, U. S. A., Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Edmonds v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Sheppard v. GiebelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API