Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Walker

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1932No. 14966PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The 'question presented is whether the appellant can be held a violator of the law by reason of his operating a coin-vending machine, as defined in subdivision 23 of section 1 of chapter 212, General Laws of the 42d Legislature, Regular Session (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St., art. 7047, -sub. 23), in which there is imposed an occupation tax upon the operation of such vending machines. In the act it is said: “From every owner, manager, or exhibitor of every coin operated phonograph, electrical piano, electrical battery, graphophone, weighing machines, target pistol, miniature…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The Texas Company v. StephensTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Pullman P. C. Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Rainey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. WynneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dancetown, U. S. A., Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State of Texas v. Southwestern Gas Elec. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API