Ex Parte Walker
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The 'question presented is whether the appellant can be held a violator of the law by reason of his operating a coin-vending machine, as defined in subdivision 23 of section 1 of chapter 212, General Laws of the 42d Legislature, Regular Session (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St., art. 7047, -sub. 23), in which there is imposed an occupation tax upon the operation of such vending machines. In the act it is said: “From every owner, manager, or exhibitor of every coin operated phonograph, electrical piano, electrical battery, graphophone, weighing machines, target pistol, miniature…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Texas Company v. StephensTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Pullman P. C. Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. WynneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Dancetown, U. S. A., Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- State of Texas v. Southwestern Gas Elec. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.