Legal Opinion

State v. Rutledge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The defendant upon trial by jury was convicted of rape. During the course of trial the state produced evidence that medical examination disclosed live sperm in the body of the victim, which sperm, according to the doctor’s testimony, would have been deposited in her body about the time she said the rape occurred.

After the jury had returned its verdict defense counsel moved for a new trial and when this motion was denied, moved for an order supplementing the record. The affidavits supporting the motions stated in substance that the defendant had undergone a vasectomy some years before the rape…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Turner v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. CadiganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API