Hill v. Leichliter
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Arn, J.:
This is a damage action to recover for loss of a standing wheat crop which was destroyed by fire. The jury’s verdict was for defendant and plaintiffs appeal. The facts may be sufficiently noted from the following résumé of the pleadings.
In the second amended petition, plaintiffs allege they are rési*87dents of Rawlins county, Kansas, and are co-owners of a wheat crop located on a tract of land in that county; that the defendant is a resident of the same county and engaged in the business of selling and repairing combines; that on July 10, 1946,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of New York Insurance v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Elam v. BruengerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Marley v. Wichita Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Jilka v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark v. CassettyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Fralick v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Hunt v. BriggsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Bearry v. BrensingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Ellis Canning Co. v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.