Legal Opinion

Ellis Canning Co. v. International Harvester Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1953No. 38,910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action by an insured for the use and benefit of the insurer to recover the amount of a fire loss from a thud party for alleged negligence causing such loss. The appeal is from rulings of the trial court on plaintiff’s motion to strike and its demurrer to the third paragraph of the defendant’s answer.

The facts of the case are of little importance to a decision of the issue involved and there is no dispute between the parties regarding the contents of the pleadings which can be stated in summary fashion.

In its petition plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of New York Insurance v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Klingberg v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Hume v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Hill v. LeichliterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Associates Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Thompson v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  3. Springfield Monarch Insurance v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Catalfano v. HigginsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  5. Dondlinger & Sons' Construction Co. v. Emcco, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API