Legal Opinion

In re Malik O.

New York City Family Court

Decided April 26, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Maureen A. McLeod, J.

This proceeding was commenced on October 16, 1992 by the Office of the Corporation Counsel (the presentment agency) pursuant to article 3 of the Family Court Act charging respondents with acts, which if committed by an adult would constitute criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 165.40) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). The petitions before the court allege that on October 14, 1992, the three corespondents entered the card store of complainant Vinod Patel and attempted to take Halloween items valuing $50.

On March…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re C.S.New York Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re S.S.New York City Family Court · 2007
  3. Matter of C.S.New York Family Court, Bronx County · 2006
  4. Matter of S.S.New York Family Court, Nassau County · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API